Evolution vs. Creationism
Evolution vs. Creationism
Religious organizations scrutinize the complexity of the aggregation of all things in existence and deduce by reasoning that we’re observing an irreducible complexity. They’ll inform one to take notice of the complexity of the solar system and life here on Mother Earth and rationalize these complexities simply couldn’t have naturally evolved and therefore, an intelligent complex creator created these complexities.
Similar to the fact an automobile can’t naturally appear without an automaker, these complexities simply couldn’t have impromptu naturally evolved.
If what they claim is true, then the logical question that comes to mind is: Was it indeed an intelligent complex creator who created the complexities of life as we know it or did it evolve through natural evolution?
Religious organizations believe an intelligent complex creator is imperative to our existence, the majority of scientists believe otherwise. The complexity of the universe and life on Mother Earth did indeed evolve through natural evolution. According to scientist, Natural Evolution is a process of cumulative change or the increasing or growing in amount by successive additions and can be divided into two parts, micro and macro. Micro evolution is indeed a fact and have been observed, however macro evolution remains a theory due to simply fact that the exact steps of the evolutionary process and “missing links” have yet to be found. These “missing links” or “gaps” (which proves evolution is indeed a fact as far as I’m concern), in fossil records are caused by the fact that the process of macro evolution takes billions and billions of years to complete its cycle.
This is the main reason scientist can’t trace the exact evolutionary steps of the four and a half trillion species on Mother Earth. Scientist can however prove, beyond a shadow of doubt that humans beings evolved. Scientist has successfully trace human evolution back conclusively three and half million years ago. If one could live for billions and billions of years one could obviously observe macro evolution.
For those of you who believe otherwise, Natural Evolution does not teach that humans evolved from apes! This idiotic rational is taught by people who simply don’t through understanding the evolutionary process and wants to protect their faith and belief of the existence of a god. Natural Evolution clearly teaches that humans and apes are closely related all (primates are related), similar to the fact that, although not primates, scorpions and spiders are related. Being closely related doesn’t mean one evolved from the other!
The advantages of natural evolution are that it is self-regulating, self-complete and self-contain and therefore, no other justification or prerequisite is required or needed to justify its position. The problem with the rational that an intelligent complex creator is needed to create a group of related elements taken as a single entity is that it’s a profound and obvious self-contradiction and therefore a logical fallacy. For if the complexity of life and the solar system needed an intelligent complex creator to create it as you claim, then the profound and obvious question I must ask you is: “Who created the intelligent complex creator since, as you claim, complexities simply can’t naturally evolve?”
The most popular and idiotic answer I receive to this question is: “He was just there or He just always existed!” Well, if he was just there or he just always existed (whatever the hell that’s supposed to mean), then something can and did come into existence without an intelligent complex creator creating it and this is a profound and obvious contradiction and logical fallacy of your reasoning!
In other words, I can simply eliminate everything in existence and that would leave the intelligent complex creator itself. If your rational that an intelligent complex creator is needed to create complexities is true, then an intelligent complex creator would have had to also create the intelligent complex creator and an intelligent complex creator would have had to create the intelligent complex creator of the intelligent complex creator which obviously means, the creation of an intelligent complex creator would never cease and the creation of the solar system and the world as we know it would have never been created! Now can you fathom the ignorance of your rational of an intelligent complex creator creating complexities?
As for me: your claim that “He was just there or He just always existed” is simply the most ridiculous and idiotic answer one can give! The most rational, logical and intelligent answer to my question would obviously be: “Over an extended period of time, the intelligent complex creator “naturally evolved” and then started his creation process.” Isn’t this rational far more logical and intelligent than your lame ass rational that: “He was just there or He just always existed”?
My rational is obviously far more superior due to the fact that, since this intelligent complex creator is the “one and only”, ultimate and supreme source (or the one and only true God), no other source could possibility exist and evolve before or after it! Again, isn’t this rational far more logical and intelligent than your lame ass rational that?
Of course if you admit the intelligent complex creator “naturally evolved” then you have no choice but to admit that natural evolution is indeed a fact and not a theory, which is why you continue to give the idiotic answer “He was just there or He just always existed”!
For the most part, time and nature are the guiding principles of what we comprehend to be the governing authority, a generally accepted condition or course of action we must take. Natural law (laws of nature), instincts, self-preservation and structure system governs our existence. If you want to correlate natural law with a God, by all means do so; just don’t ask me to do it with you!
I accept natural evolution as a fact; most people accept it as a theory. Okay, let us analyze this theory. If natural evolution is a theory as you claim, it’s a well distinguish theory whose principles are based on factual evidence, not on faith and beliefs, you all simply refuse to acknowledge this fact! Creationism to me is by far the most idiotic and ridiculous hypothesis ever devised to explain our existence and that of the world. There’s absolutely no structural physical evidence to back your claim of the existence of a God. The principles of creationism are based on faith and beliefs, not on physical factual evidence! This serious lack of physical evidence for the theory of a God’s existence obviously proves that the theory of evolution is far more plausible than the theory of creation.
Creationism is simply an unconditional belief, natural evolution isn’t. I can, at the very least, discern and analyze the factual evidence on the theory of natural evolution. Although natural evolution may not have all the answers (there’s obviously enough for me as you may have notice) at the moment, it at least continues searching for the answers and it gives me the opportunity to search for the answers as well. I simply can’t believe and have faith in an unconditional belief whose principles are based on nothing other than faith and beliefs! That is simply senseless to me!
Just being content with faith and beliefs is simply boring to me, drop dead boring as a matter of fact. I don’t want to believe and have faith, I want to think! Analytical thinking is far more interesting, fun and healthier for the brain as far as I’m concern. All faith and beliefs gives you is a passage to “perfect and protect” you illogical, abnormal and idiotic way of thinking and the resource to worship something you simply believe and have faith to exist, nothing more!